Brainy Quote of the Day

Sunday, June 1, 2014

Misogyny's Mirror...

"The man who views the world at 50 the same as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." Muhammad Ali

A letter to my sons:

My hope at now a few years beyond half a century, that I've been a good example to you. Above all, I hope you know me as "Pop" and never encounter the man I was before I met your mother. Oh, he could write a military communications-electronics plan, he witnessed the rise of DARPANET to its commercial evolution the Internet; he knew engineering, physics and advanced mathematics; he was as much the Trekkie you enjoyed as we watched "The Next Generation," "Deep Space Nine" and "Voyager." He was also at that time shallow, self-centered and quite useless to the human species. He mistook conquest for intimacy.

That man was eager to be a part of the crowd; ran with the dogs of the porch; became a "player" because - before your mother - I apparently could not let on to the Ferrell military wolf pack at that time I was in an actual "relationship" with any woman; influenced easily by others that were themselves not as cock-sure and confident of their swagger as they had led on. Many of them are now the "old-men-at-the-bar": buying drinks on the fantasy someone still wants to see their wrinkled, sagging-without-pants butt-ugly-naked bodies; or interestingly ministers, I assume to atone for our previous promiscuous sins.

I've been reading the trend on Twitter: #YesAllWomen. It would be far too easy to distance myself from the massacre that occurred in Isla Vista at UC Santa Barbara, or the attacks resulting in greater than 200 girls kidnapped by Boka Haram. They are related, reflected in the same dark mirror as the hash tag that has over a million hits world wide from the continent of Africa, Europe, Pakistan and the Americas.

It was not your video games that created this; it was not hip-hop music; it was not a "lack of family values." Those are merely symptoms of misogyny.

It was us: men and the culture of entitlement we've created for ourselves.

It has been imbibed deeply in the stories we've told ourselves: Eve and the apple; "once upon a time." Always, it is the "Prince Charming" that rides to the rescue and slays the evil dragon, never the woman who saves herself. Always, it is Cyrano and Christian contesting and collaborating for the possession of Roxanne, even if by proxy for Cyrano. The feelings of the female and to whom she would like to couple - Adam, Charming, Cyrano or Christian - is seen as an afterthought, irrelevant, a non-issue. Roxanne would have gladly chosen Cyrano (which, is kind of creepy as they were cousins) had he only "asked" rather than worship her from the shadows and treat her like fragile china, a possession: a THING, a brass ring; a prize to be won. The most pious chronicles, the most fantastic, fantasy-based stories; the most "romantic" narratives of all time objectify women as second-class human beings, and not full, equal participants in society. It even extends to the sciences, sadly (see 1 hr, 1 min, 15 second mark:

I am writing this to you to disabuse yourselves from such notions. Even at the height of my youth, I could easily walk up to a table of young ladies at any bar in Austin, Texas and ask all (say five) to dance - all five could turn me down. My feelings would be hurt, but I'm not so injured that I'm homicidal. Being "shot-down"/rejected is a part of the agreed "game." If successful at this game, I was guilty of the violence of the lie ("love" is a four-letter-word); the cheat (the ambition to fill a black book and impress the aforementioned "pack"); the steal (as in wasting their precious time); the killing of hope (see previously "lie") and the baggage these women inevitably took into their relationships beyond me. These women: daughters, sisters, cousins, mothers, friends, lovers - humans, deserved better.

Your grandfather gave me some advice that I later put in a haiku:

Father's wisdom: a
Man has caught a woman when
She embraces him.

Meaning: if you don't say or do anything too stupid, you probably - with some manners and patience have a good chance at a relationship, which may only be a friendship, and that is quite fine. The choices of sharing her life and/or her body are hers, and not your entitlement. We need more friendships between the sexes, and less of the following:

Women are not "goals": notches on your belt or proof of your masculinity. Women are not property as slaves, goldfish or Labrador retrievers. Numbers do not prove your virility, they would instead prove your shallowness, and increase the possibility of an STD. There are other greater things you could be known for that could help others; solve an intractable problem; advance the human species and show the positivism of your background, culture and inner natures. No simply means no, which as another human being they have a right to say. I speak this life into you at 50+ so you can glean from my own sad mistakes. My quote:

"Experience isn't the best teacher: other people's experiences is the best teacher."

  1. 1 in 3 American women, 42 million women, plus 28 million children, either live in poverty or are right on the brink of it. (The report defines the “brink of poverty” as making $47,000 a year for a family of four.)
  2. Nearly two-thirds of minimum wage workers are women, and these workers often get zero paid sick days.
  3. Two-thirds of American women are either the primary or co-breadwinners of their families.
  4. The average woman is paid 77 cents for every dollar a man makes, and that figure is much lower for black and Latina women; African American women earn only 64 cents and Hispanic women only 55 cents for every dollar made by a white man. More at:

The above comprises US data, the world is similarly worse. It would appear that the path to world peace is not in the bombs we make, but in the way we treat our women.

Because of this misogynistic culture - underpaid professional cheerleaders, exploited hip-hop video vixens, over-sexual game avatars and reality TV show stars, there are some women that will support their own exploitation unawares. It is a form of Stockholm syndrome; insidious mental conditioning through consumer marketing. You can only help to an extent, but my advice would be to wish them well, move on to someone whom you can both love and respect. Rage or the enactment of violence should never be a part of your interactions. The women you encounter are daughters, sisters, cousins, mothers, friends, lovers: humans!

It is the same way you would like to see me (or any man) treat your own mother.

As men, we need to clear this dark mirror, atone and try again, mightily.

Love always, Pop


  1. You hint at behavior you now regret. Can you be more specific?

    1. I find it incredulous that anyone would make demands for specifics under the pseudonym "anonymous." It also shows you didn't read the essay: "He [meaning me] mistook conquest for intimacy" ends the first paragraph. No specifics are necessary, you got all you'd ever need on 23 May 2014 and #YesAllWomen. For you, I have only one hash tag: #coward.

    2. A simple no would have sufficed. I wonder what your reaction would be if your sons were to "demand" specifics.

      Your essay is just another exercise in public hand-wringing. The only people who have the courage to be truthful about misogyny are its victims.

  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

  3. You are still a #coward. You demanded specifics, which is a kind of remote voyerism at best; psychopathic at worst. I am mildy entertained you still hide behind the pseudonym "anonymous." Is that how you receive your mail? "Public hand wringing," or an admittance that I was as much a part of the creation of misogyny as the "Men's Rights Movement" (which I think is moribund and destructive). You, as troll have another problem I think you should seek professional help for: Now, slink away coward. I also have to power to delete your inane commentary. Romper room probably has a blog more to your liking (they allow pacifiers there as well).

  4. To put a final nail in this coffin: my sons, whom I love dearly, have every right to demand specifics and access to same. Cowardly Internet trolls hiding in plain sight refusing to give their names do not!

  5. I read your last comments #coward. As promised, I deleted them. Now it gets serious: has a tab for reporting threats and crimes. Your "anonymous" has a forensic signature: your TCP/IP can be traced easily by government Cray supercomputers. I'm just waiting for you to do something so colossally stupid like that. I'll then look you in the face - in a court of law - as you then realize how you will have pissed your life away. Any attempts beyond this will be seen as harassment, reported to Google and the Feds. Good luck in the prison showers.